Modelling energy efficiency of an integrated anaerobic digestion and photodegradation of distillery effluent using response surface methodology
Journal article
Authors/Editors
Research Areas
No matching items found.
Publication Details
Author list: Apollo S, Onyango MS, Ochieng A
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Group
Place: ABINGDON
Publication year: 2016
Journal: Environmental Technology (0959-3330)
Journal acronym: ENVIRON TECHNOL
Volume number: 37
Issue number: 19
Start page: 2435
End page: 2446
Number of pages: 12
ISSN: 0959-3330
eISSN: 1479-487X
Languages: English-Great Britain (EN-GB)
View in Web of Science | View on publisher site | View citing articles in Web of Science
Abstract
Anaerobic digestion (AD) is efficient in organic load removal and bioenergy recovery when applied in treating distillery effluent; however, it is ineffective in colour reduction. In contrast, ultraviolet (UV) photodegradation post-treatment for the AD-treated distillery effluent is effective in colour reduction but has high energy requirement. The effects of operating parameters on bioenergy production and energy demand of photodegradation were modelled using response surface methodology (RSM) with a view of developing a sustainable process in which the biological step could supply energy to the energy-intensive photodegradation step. The organic loading rate (OLRAD) and hydraulic retention time (HRTAD) of the initial biological step were the variables investigated. It was found that the initial biological step removed about 90% of COD and only about 50% colour while photodegradation post-treatment removed 98% of the remaining colour. Maximum bioenergy production of 180.5kWh/m(3) was achieved. Energy demand of the UV lamp was lowest at low OLRAD irrespective of HRTAD, with values ranging between 87 and 496kWh/m(3). The bioenergy produced formed 93% of the UV lamp energy demand when the system was operated at OLRAD of 3kg COD/m(3)d and HRT of 20 days. The presumed carbon dioxide emission reduction when electricity from bioenergy was used to power the UV lamp was 28.8kg CO(2)e/m(3), which could reduce carbon emission by 31% compared to when electricity from the grid was used, leading to environmental conservation.
Keywords
Anaerobic digestion, bioenergy, carbon dioxide emission reduction, response surface methodology, UV photodegradation
Documents
No matching items found.