Techno-economical assessment of coal and biomass gasification-based hydrogen production supply chain system
Journal article
Authors / Editors
Research Areas
No matching items found.
Publication Details
Author list: Muresan M, Cormos CC, Agachi PS
Publisher: Elsevier
Place: RUGBY
Publication year: 2013
Journal: Chemical Engineering Research and Design (0263-8762)
Journal acronym: CHEM ENG RES DES
Volume number: 91
Issue number: 8
Start page: 1527
End page: 1541
Number of pages: 15
ISSN: 0263-8762
Languages: English-Great Britain (EN-GB)
View in Web of Science | View on publisher site | View citing articles in Web of Science
Abstract
Hydrogen is an energy carrier that represents a possible clean fuel of the future. This paper assesses the effect of biomass co-firing on gasification based hydrogen production supply chain, with carbon dioxide capture and storage, from technical, economical and environmental point of view. Several cases consisting of various feedstocks to the gasification reactor are investigated (coal only and coal in mixture with sawdust or wheat straw). Considered plant concepts generate between 330 and 460 MW hydrogen of 99.99% (vol.) purity.First a performance analysis regarding the energy efficiency of the process, the syngas composition and the carbon dioxide capture rate is carried out. The simulations are made using chemical process simulation software Aspen Plus. Second, total capital investment and operating costs for the gasification plant are evaluated. Finally, using the results from Aspen Plus simulations and the cost estimations, a discrete event model is developed, to address hydrogen production supply chain analysis under demand variability, with Arena software. The implications of biomass co-firing on the system are evaluated in terms of: hydrogen amount sold and hydrogen amount stored (MW), hydrogen lost sales amount (MW), partial sales percent and gasification plant profit.The results show that as the biomass quantity in the feedstock increases the hydrogen production rate decreases by 9-28% for sawdust, respectively by 7-23% for wheat straw. The energy efficiency of the process and the gasification plant profit also decrease, but the CO2 emissions are lower for the cases of biomass co-firing. (C) 2013 The Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords
Biomass co-firing, CO2 capture, Entrained flow, Gasification, Hydrogen production, Supply chain
Documents
No matching items found.